BACK TO:

 

Definitions of Symbols used in this Website

An excellent general reference (and essentially the bible for research in this area) for symmetric functions is the book Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials by I.G. Macdonald, Oxford Science Publications, Second Edition 1995. There are other references for symmetric functions, Segan

are the Schur symmetric functions
are the homogeneous symmetric functions
are the power symmetric functions
emu(X) are the elementary symmetric functions
mmu(X) are the monomial symmetric functions
Define an inner product <a,b> by the values on the power symmetric functions by def of standard symmetric function inner product. This is the standard inner product on symmetric functions.

The Schur symmetric functions have the property that they are upper triangularly related to the monomial symmetric functions and orthogonal with respect to the <a,b> inner product.

Define an inner product <a,b>t by the values on the power symmetric functions by definition of Hall-Littlewood scalar product. This is usually referred to as the Hall-Littlewood scalar product.

Define the symmetric functions dual Schur symmetric functions to be the symmetric functions with the property defintion of dual Schur symmetric functions. These are the dual-Schur symmetric functions.

Define another inner product Macdonald inner product by the values on the power symmetric functions by

definition of Macdonald SF inner product

This is the Macadonald inner product or the q,t-inner product.

The Macdonald symmetric functions Pmu(X,q,t) are defined by the property that they are upper triangularly related to the monomial symmetric functions and orthogonal with respect to the Macdonald inner product inner product. That is, they satisfy the following two conditions
  1. condition 1 of defintion of Macdonald symmetric functions where the sum is over lambda smaller than gif in dominance order.
  2. condition 2 in defintion of MP if lambda not equal mu.
Let defintion of Jmu[X;q,t] where

Jmu[X;q,t] has the expansion sum defintion of Klambdamu(q,t) where the sum is over all lambda partitions of n and this is the defintion of the q,t-Kostka coefficients, Klambdamu(q,t). The Jmu[X;q,t] are usually referred to as the integral form of the Macdonald symmetric functions.

Define defintion of the Hmu[X;q,t]to be another class of symmetric functions. I find that these are slighly easier to work with than the Jmu[X;q,t].
Define the basis definition of the Hwigglesas a transformed basis for the Jmu[X;q,t] symmetric functions. This basis is important because it is conjectured to be the Frobenius characteristic of the n! conjecture module. The corresponding transformed coefficients will be defined as definition of the Klambdamuwiggles.
The Hall-Littlewood symmetric functions that appear here are transformed from the standard symmetric functions. They are given by the formula definition of the Hall-Littlewoodwhere the first sum is over 1 ¾ i < j ¾ n and the second sum is over all j and 1 ¾ i ¾ n. The are analogous to theJmu[X;q,t] (in fact equal when q = 0) but are a transformation of the symmetric functions normally referred to as Hall-Littlewood polynomials. The transition coefficients with the Schur symmetric basis are the t-Kostka coefficients.
Occasionally, plethystic notation is used for symmetric functions here. This is a notational device for expressing the substitution of the monomials of one expression, $E = E(t_1, t_2, t_3, \ldots)$ for the variables of a symmetric function, $P$. The result will be denoted by $P[E]$ and represents the expression found by expanding $P$ in terms of the power symmetric functions and then substituting for $p_k$ the expression $E(t_1^k, t_2^k, t_3^k, \ldots)$.

More precisely, if the power sum expansion of the symmetric function $P$ is given by $$P = \sum_\la c_\la p_\la$$ then the $P[E]$ is given by the formula $$P[E] = \sum_\la c_\la p_\la \coeff_{p_k \rightarrow E(t_1^k, t_2^k, t_3^k, \ldots)}$$.

To express a symmetric function in a single set of variables $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$, let $X_n = x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_n$. The expression $P[X_n]$ represents the symmetric function $P$ evaluated at the variables $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n$ since

$$P(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) = \sum_\la c_\la p_\la \coeff_{p_k \rightarrow x_1^k + x_2^k + \cdots + x_n^k} = P[X_n]$$